Clarify origin of industry assumptions

This commit is contained in:
Tom Brown 2019-11-27 20:28:19 +01:00
parent 6cbd3384e4
commit 51aa25aace
2 changed files with 6 additions and 5 deletions

3
.gitignore vendored
View File

@ -35,4 +35,5 @@ gurobi.log
*.pyc
/cutouts
/tmp
/tmp
/pypsa

View File

@ -148,11 +148,11 @@ solving:
#feasopt_tolerance: 1.e-6
industry:
'DRI_ratio' : 0.5 #ratio of blast-furnace steel transformed into DRI + electric arc
'H2_DRI' : 1.7 #H2 consumption in Direct Reduced Iron (DRI), MWh_H2/ton_Steel
'Al_to_scrap' : 0.5 # ratio of primary-route Aluminum transformed into scrap
'DRI_ratio' : 0.5 #ratio of today's blast-furnace steel (60% primary route, 40% secondary) to future assumption (30% primary, 70% secondary), transformed into DRI + electric arc
'H2_DRI' : 1.7 #H2 consumption in Direct Reduced Iron (DRI), MWh_H2/ton_Steel from Vogl et al (2018) doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.279
'Al_to_scrap' : 0.5 # ratio of primary-route Aluminum transformed into scrap (today 40% to future 20% primary route)
'H2_for_NH3' : 85000 # H2 for NH3 transformed from SMR to electrolyzed-H2, in GWh/year following Lechtenböhmer(2016)
plotting:
map:
figsize: [7, 7]